This forum is now closed.
Please join us at the new Lumion Community forum.
Lumion Community
Use your email address and password from the old forum to log in if your account was created before Feb 20 2020.
Otherwise, you will need to create a new Lumion Account at the new forum.

Author Topic: comparative quality and render time  (Read 3254 times)

Gilson Antunes

    Reputation: 130
comparative quality and render time
« on: March 05, 2015, 01:21:25 am »
March 05, 2015, 01:21:25 am

I want to share the final result with a comparative quality and render time.


The first image was made using  Lumion 5.3 Hyperlight (GPU) with an approximate time of 11 seconds in a Reder GTX Titan.
The second image is Raytrace 3dsMax 2015 (CPU) with render time approximately 7 minutes Core i7 3.5GHz 32GB.


I note that Lumion is very evolving in terms of quality, in a quick look is more difficult to distinguish the difference.


There was a time when I had to generate all the still images in Ray Trace, leaving only the video to Lumion, however was a big problem because in addition to having to set up the same scene twice, I did not have the same vegetation SpeedTree for 3dsMax .


Now, fortunately I can already work with only one file for all.  :-D
Gilson Antunes
www.gilsonantunes.com.br
RTX 2080Ti / Win7 / (TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4,00GHz / RAM 64Gb DDR-4 / SSD 1,5Tb

IdeaImmagine

    Reputation: 4
Re: comparative quality and render time
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2015, 07:34:18 am »
March 05, 2015, 07:34:18 am
Great comparison!

Re: comparative quality and render time
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2015, 10:03:27 am »
March 05, 2015, 10:03:27 am
I see the exercise bike handles are a bit faceted in the Lumion render.

Thanks for the comparison Gilson.  Much appreciated in creating a topic for it.
IMPORTANT: Please do not send private messages and emails to members of staff - unless we specifically ask you to send us sensitive information, for example License Keys.

cadmunkey

    Reputation: 5
Re: comparative quality and render time
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2015, 11:58:21 am »
March 05, 2015, 11:58:21 am
Great, shows how fast Lumion is evolving. The team must be very proud, keep up the good work guys!

Re: comparative quality and render time
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2015, 12:12:53 pm »
March 05, 2015, 12:12:53 pm
Cheers! :)
IMPORTANT: Please do not send private messages and emails to members of staff - unless we specifically ask you to send us sensitive information, for example License Keys.

BMcIsaac

Re: comparative quality and render time
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2015, 12:49:16 pm »
March 05, 2015, 12:49:16 pm
11 seconds vs 7 minutes  8) ....(somebody should be worried)

The average consumer of these images would not see a difference. That makes the 3dmax workflow ( |:() about 4000% slower.